|
FIST
Clinic Notes
By Rich Strauss
I recently attended Dan Empfield's bike
fit clinic: Fit
Institute Slowtwitch, or FIST. Dan is the founder of Quintana
Roo and the inventor of the tri-bike. Here are my notes from the
clinic:
As a bike fitter, you begin with the assumption
that the rider is a triathlete and therefore wants to be
in the "optimal" tri position. The participants considered
many words until we settle on the term optimal.
Optimal Tri Position
The bike fitter moves in a clockwise direction,
from the right side of the bike. You start with cleat position
and move clockwise from there:
- 78 degree seat tube angle. This is the starting
point.
- Pedal spindle aligned to first metatarsal,
or the ball of the foot.
- Knee angle of 145-155 degrees. Fiona, a PT
and bike fitter from Canada, had some great input about
these first two factors. In short, the common pedaling
technique of pointing the toes downward at the bottom of
stroke is usually caused by a saddle that is too high.
The athlete is reaching for the six o'clock position. She
also called to my attention the relationship between hamstring
flexibility, saddle height and the hip angle: an athlete
with poor flexibility should be set up with more bend in
the knee (lower saddle). This relieves some pressure on
the hamstrings and lower back, allowing the athlete to
be in a more comfortable, but still aggressive, riding
position. This stuff is where the "art" of bike
fitting comes into play and her PT background is very useful.
- You then seek to "get your 90's":
90-degree angles formed by torso and leg (hip angle), upper
arm and torso, and by the elbows. However, you skip the
hip angle and jump to upper arm/torso angle and elbow angle.
Dan says he has found that riders naturally seek these
angles, as they provide bone support for the body weight,
instead of muscle support. In other words, the athlete
will naturally seek to support his weight on a stable column
of bone, formed by a right angle of the upper arm and torso,
instead of supporting his weight muscularly. Get these
angles first, then come back to hip angle.
- Ask the athlete to ignore the placement of
the aerobars and just put his hands where they naturally
want to go.
- Aerobar tilt is largely a function of rider
personality. An aggressive rider might want the bars tilted
downward, as they feel they use the bars to get better
leverage. A more relaxed rider (Dan calls it "whispering
louder") will want the aerobars level or even tilted up.
- Finally, you then adjust the drop between
the seat and elbow pads to the rider's comfort, while shifting
the seat fore and aft to retain the 90 degree hip angle.
You take the athlete to where they feel the best combination
of aggressive position and comfort, and then make the position
less aggressive by a notch or two. This gives the athlete
some room to play with on the fork tube by removing spacers
as the season progresses: as spacers are removed the athlete
assumes a more aggressive and aero position. Dan says that
discomfort usually comes in three flavors:
- Numbness or discomfort in your
privates. This is usually an equipment
issue and can be remedied by trying
out different saddles.
- Neck/shoulder pain or fatigue.
This is an endurance issue and usually
goes away after a few rides.
- Lower back tightness or fatigue:
lack of flexibility or sub optimal
upper arm/torso angle. In the later
case, the athlete is using his lower
back to support some of his body
weight, causing fatigue.
Three Examples
You begin with these assumptions and optimum
parameters. Then by qualifying the subject, you either retain
the optimal tri position or work backwards along the spectrum
of bike fit: from optimal tri position (most aggressive)
to "multisport position" (less aggressive) to a modified
road or "slam" position. During this qualification process
you assess the subject for flexibility, "thinness," what
they want to get out of the sport, what they want to do with
their bike, etc.
"Aggressiveness," as it relates to
riding position, is largely defined by the vertical drop
between the seat and elbow pads, and therefore refers to
the size of the rideršs frontal area exposed to the wind.
Once you approach the problem from this perspective, it is
apparent that not everyone is built for or needs to be in
this aggressive tri position and should there for be on either
a multisport or road bike. These bikes allow you to "maintain
your 90's" (again, hip angle, upper arm/torso, elbows)
in a more comfortable position better suited for the athlete.
Three examples:
- Kona AG qualifier: very fit, athletic with
aggressive goals. Wants the most aggressive/aero position
possible and has the flexibility and low body fat to achieve
it. This person would be best served on a tri-bike (78+
seat tube) in an optimal tri position.
- MOP'er, wants to race tri's but also ride
in the local road races. Maybe carrying a little extra
around the middle. Probably best served with a multisport
bike in a multisport position, allowing him to participate
on multiple roles. Seat tube angle of 74-76+ and small
elbow pad drop, relatively to tri-position.
- 65 year old woman carrying a few extra pounds.
Not very flexible or comfortable in an aggressive riding
position, as her lack of flexibility and extra layer on
the tummy will make it difficult for her to assume an aggressive
riding position. Would probably be best served on a road
bike with a slack seat tube angle and shorty aerobars,
like Jammer GT's. This will allow her to maintain her 90's
in a more upright riding postion.
After you have fitted the subject to the bike,
you then take these measurements:
- Saddle height, measured from the center of
the bottom bracket to the top/center of the saddle.
- Nose of the saddle in relation to the bottom
bracket: centimeters behind or forward of the BB.
- Distance from the saddle nose to the end of
the aerobar.
- Distance from rearward edge of elbow pads
to end of aerobars.
- Vertical drop from top of the saddle to the
elbow pads.
At this point, you have essentially measured
where the athlete's contact points are in space, relative
to each other: feet, butt, elbows and hands. Your next step
is to then either:
- Put a new bike underneath these measurements.
- Or achieve these measurements on their existing
bike by adjusting saddle position, stem length and drop,
spacers, etc.
Conclusion
The desired endstate of the fit process is an
athlete with a bike and fit combination that matches their
body (its capabilities and limitations), personality, and
goals in the sport. Where an athlete lands on the continuum
of tri-position is entirely fine. It's all good. However,
the athlete must be educated about what his best and appropriate
fit is, given the limitations of body and equipment. Not
everyone needs to be on, nor should be sold, a tri-bike.
I'm working with Hank Iglesias at Edge Cyclesports
in Laguna to provide bike fitting and personal coaching sessions
to SoCal athletes. If you are interested, please contact
me for more details: rich@cruciblefitness.com.
|