Primer for the Self-Coached
Ironman Athlete
By Rich Strauss
As I ready my team for next season, and begin to teach new
Team Crucible athletes, I've been asked to explain my ideas
on Ironman
training. I'll share these ideas here, but first I
need to set the stage. Common Pitfalls for the Self-Coached IM Athlete
Athletes usually come to me after a period of self-coaching.
I'm able to see the mistakes they have made. And as a self-coached
athlete myself, I've made them all as well. Here are
the critical pitfalls: I. An underestimation of the mental skills and
knowledge required for success on race day.
My first point has nothing to do with training. I've delivered
pre-race talks at four IMNA races, to a total of 250-300 Ironman
athletes. I've also coached Team in Training athletes. Surprisingly,
I've found both groups often have a remarkably similar knowledge
base and ask very similar questions.
We are adept at thinking of new and creative ways to beat
our heads harder and faster into a wall every day. But most
athletes spend only a fraction of that effort learning how to
execute a successful race, how to make decisions and
solve problems.
They can tell you how much time their $800 race
wheels will save them, but don't have a clue on how to pace
the bike. They haven't even rehearsed a race plan.
On race day, your fitness is only a vehicle you drive 140
miles across the finish line. The race doesn't care how fit you
are, only how well you execute. Read
Ironman
How-To, Ironman
Nutrition, and Mental Focus. II. Attempting to focus for too long on one race
With athletes now required to register 364 days before their
race, the primary question is "what the hell do I do for
a year?" This carries a tremendous risk of mental
and emotional burnout, particularly for the first-timer. It's
December. If you are putting your feet on the floor at
5:30am every morning and saying "Time to go train for
IMFL/IMWI/IMLP or any other IMNA race" you are in serious
risk of winding up in a tower with a high-powered rifle. For
most athletes it is simply too long to be focused on a single
event.
Northern athletes are at the greatest risk of burnout, with
snow and ice often relegating them to training indoors for
months
at at time. The key is to structure most of the season
to address limiters, not to train for a race. For my
Ironman athletes, our focuses right now are:
• Run: moderate volume as a result
of frequent, Easy to Steady runs. Running
form addressed through drills and Strides. Consistency and frequency
are paramount. I'm not very concerned with volume right now. We have scheduled
5k's, 10k's in the winter and spring half marathons to provide us with fitness
target dates.
• Bike: addressing the basic limiters of speed skills
and force. No
concern
for cycling volume. I'm very reluctant to have athletes on the trainer
longer than is necessary to address basic limiters. Again, my critical
mission is addressing limiters and keeping these athletes as mentally fresh
as possible. • Swim: technique and recovery. My stronger swimmers are
swimming for recovery
purposes or not at all. My guidance is "if it's your strength and
a logistical pain in the ass right now, don't worry about it. Plenty
of time later in the season." Body composition and flexibility: limit the damage during the holidays and then
progress toward a body comp and flexibility goal to be achieved by the beginning
of race specific training.
The key thread here is effectively addressing limiters, not training for a race
months and months away. III. Confusion about the training volume required for success
Before we can talk about training volume, we must first define "success." Your
definition of success must be framed within your current fitness, your time available
to train, and recovery resources available. How important is recovery? Read
Rest and Recovery.
Two realistic definitions of success:
1. Age group athlete. Works 40-50 hours per week. Has a wife, three
kids, 20% body fat, and a half IM personal best of 6:30. This will
be his first Ironman. This athlete will have limited training time,
limited recovery time, and does not have a significant base of fitness. He
should define success for his first IM as "finish with a smile on my
face."
2. Elite age grouper. Works 35-40hrs per week. Single with
no weekend commitments, half IM personal best of 4:45, four Ironman finishes. This
athlete can have a more aggressive definition of success because he has the
base
fitness,
training and recovery time resources to back it up.
Let's get back to the question of training volume:
Q: How much do I need to train to achieve my realistic definition of success?
A: How much time to you have available, to both train AND recover?
If you can train 10-13 hours per week, recover, and still juggle the other
much more important balls in your life, then that is your reality. Train
within that reality.
Read Event Based
Volume. I wrote
this almost two years ago and had another version published in Inside Triathlon. It's
simple and it works. It's
what I've used for over two years of Ironman coaching. In short, disregard
your weekly training volume and instead focus on:
1. The purpose of every training session and it's successful execution.
2. The volume of your long bike and run.
The volume of your "other sessions" is what it is, given your personal
schedule. Don't worry about the volume, just focus on their character
and execute them the best you can, given your recovery state that day.
Misunderstanding
of IM Specific Fitness and its Development
The fitness systems or components required for
success at the IM distance are:
-
Optimal body composition. Why train
harder or longer when you can gain instant fitness with
improved body comp?
-
Improved economy (swim technique, pedaling
efficiency and bike fit, running economy). Again, free
speed.
-
Endurance, the ability to "go" for
a long time. The base for all other fitness systems.
-
Force, the ability to produce forceful muscle
contractions.
-
Muscular Endurance, the ability to sustain
these contractions for a long time. ME = E + F
Most self-coached athletes misunderstand how
to develop these fitness components, or place them in the wrong
order. This confusion is extremely common and begins
with the typical athlete's definition of success at the IM
distance as:
Success = THE Distance
+ Speed
THE Distance = 2.4 + 112
+ 26.2 = 140.6 miles
Athletes can definitely wrap their heads around those numbers and the idea
of 140 miles in a single definitely drives home the point that they will have
to do some long training. They may even buy into the concept of Event
Based Volume and understand it would behoove them to swim 1 x 4k, bike 1 x
100-112, and run 2.5 hrs, as separate sessions, at least once before race day. High
volume training, to build the endurance required to move our bodies 140.6 miles
in 17 hours. You can't fake the funk on this one.
Speed = Go Faster.
How do we do that? This book, this website, that training partner says
faster = Lactate Threshold-based training. Track, tempo intervals, hammer
rides, etc. "After all, it worked when I was training for Olympic
distance."
So to achieve this definition of Success, we
must combine high volume and high intensity training, right? Wrong!
It's not about who goes fastest but rather
who slows down the least.
IM training volume + LT-based "get faster" training
is sub-optimal. Notice I didn't say it doesn't work. This
is how I trained myself until about April of 2003 and I was
very successful. But it is extremely difficult for the
average, or even above-average, self-coached athlete to manage. I
managed it, but I'm not average. I'm a geek, live and
breath this stuff, and am just barely smart enough to know
when to back off. But I was waayyyyy on the edge for
the first 18 months of my IM career. The fact is that
most self-coached athletes think if some is good, then more
must be better. They don't back off when they need to,
or they do too much, too hard, all the time.
Why is Distance + LT-based training model
suboptimal?
-
The combination of high volume and high intensity
carries a high risk of injury. We can talk all day
about sexy, high speed training to get you faster. Great.
Do it and get faster. Want to lose it all? Get
hurt. 90% of IM training success is nothing more
than simply showing up every single day. The other
10% is just details.
-
It's inefficient for a number of reasons,
but most importantly because as the athlete gets closer
to the race he targets the wrong fitness system. I'm
an elite IM competitor and my avg IM heart rate is 25-30
beats below my LTHR. Who cares what your pace or
power is at LTHR? How fast are you at this IM heart
rate? It's the difference between being 40k TT strong
and 112 mile strong. Two different fitness systems
and two different skill sets.
Therefore, for 97% of the self-coached Ironman
athletes in the world, there MUST be an inverse relationship
between training volume and training intensity.
Time Investment Manager
Our most
precious resource is time. Time to work, time to train, time with
our families and time with ourselves. There is only so much of it
and everyone needs more. As a self-coached Ironman athlete your
primary role is a Time Investment Manager.
When you begin
to plan your training, and as you manage the details going
forward, ask yourself two questions:
-
How
do I effectively manage the variables of duration, frequency and
intensity? For most working Ironman athletes, training
frequency is largely determined by real world demands. The
question then becomes –what is the combination of intensity and
training volume appropriate to me?”
-
Given my strengths, weaknesses, and the unique demands of
Ironman racing, where are my optimum time investment
opportunities for each sport? Ięll discuss these ideas in future
installments.
Aerobic
Threshold: The Appropriate Intensity for Ironman Training.
Gordo Byrn has written a
great deal on this subject. You can find his ideas
here. Mine are
here. The key points I communicate to my
athletes are:
-
The purpose of training at or near aerobic threshold is to
expose you to a small to moderate amount of lactate, again, and
again, and again. In other words, the recovery cost of the
session is relatively low, supporting frequent exposure to this
intensity.
-
High frequency, moderate to high volume of exposure to this
intensity is good.
-
Pace is –Focused” vs Just Riding/Running Along (JRA). You are
required to focus a bit to maintain this pace. The mental focus
required for Steady training is critical for Ironman success.
-
The combination of volume and intensity is what makes a Steady
session difficult, not the volume or intensity alone. Steady is
not •hard.ę A 4 hour ride may not be hard. But most athletes
find a 3-4 hour Steady ride quite challenging. If you donęt,
Ięll tell you that your Steady isnęt Steady enough.
Appropriate
Training Volume
What volume of training is
appropriate for you? First, realize that training volume
contains two recovery costs: physical and mental. Your
ability to pay for the physical cost improves with improved
fitness. Billęs 5 hour easy ride may be Joeęs epic adventure, from an endurance perspective.
Read Event Based Volume for a
more detailed discussion of raw training volume. I'll cover
more details when we discuss weekly and annual scheduling.
But we often
overlook the mental cost of training volume.
-
What is your mental perspective on what •longę is and what is
the mental cost of these long sessions? In other words, how big
a deal to you is a 2 hour run or 4 hour ride? How much mental
preparation is required before the session and how much mental
recovery time do you need after the session?
-
How long do you have until your race and do you really need to
be training •longę for six months? Will you go nuts if you do?
Will you be divorced/unemployed?
-
What is your training environment? The mental cost of alone in
the basement is quite different from in the sun with your
friends. If you are racing Ironman Florida and are restricted
to indoor training, do you need to be going long in the basement
in February? How will the mental cost of that training affect
you four months down the road?
-
How much mental energy do you have and do you have a strategy to
conserve this energy across the entire season? The nature of
your long sessions can either burn you out very quickly or
encourage you to be fresh and motivated for the entire season.
Itęs largely a function of perspective and effective
scheduling.
Appropriate
Combination of Training Volume and Intensity
Given the above, how do
you determine the combination of volume and intensity appropriate
for you? Use the concepts in
Event Based Volume to suggest raw training volumes for weekday
and key training sessions. For the percentage of this raw
volume at Steady, Ięve developed the concept of Repeatability:
-
For weekday sessions: could I/would I want to repeat this
workout tomorrow if I had to?
-
For long/weekend sessions: will this combination of volume and
intensity compromise my workouts scheduled for the next 48
hours?
Allow this
combination of volume and intensity to be self-selected, given how
you feel that day. This allows you to manage the mental and
physical recovery costs of the session in real time. Remember,
you want to expose yourself to this intensity frequently, first,
for a long time, second. Too much intensity and/or volume
will compromise downstream sessions, reducing this exposure.
As you become physically and mentally stronger the percentage of
Steady within each session will increase naturally. A
typical Crucible Fitness workout will be –Ride/run for X min at
Easy with Self-Selected Steady time.” How much Steady time? You
determine that on the fly. Ride how you feel. Before long Steady
is just what you do, without even thinking about it. Let it
happen naturally. See below for possible alternatives to the
Self-Selected Steady approach.
Summary
Your primary role as a
self-coached athlete is Time Investment Manager, investing your
time wisely to yield the highest rate of return. The first
component of this is determining a combination of volume and
intensity appropriate for you. Training at or near Aerobic
Threshold is most effective because it is intense enough to
encourage adaptation but easy enough to support the relatively
high volume training often required for Ironman. Training volume
is highly individual and is a function of physical and mental
endurance. Use the guidance in
Event Based Volume to guide your raw volume decisions. When
combining intensity and volume, use the concept of Repeatability:
could I/would I want to repeat this workout tomorrow, if I had
too? If I stay the course in this long session will it compromise
my downstream training sessions? The best method is to
self-select the amount of Steady time in each workout, managing
your recovery cost in real time.
Next:
Weekly Scheduling
Strategies
for managing the mental cost of training volume
Purpose: to keep the
athlete mentally and spiritually engage in their training across
an entire season, enhancing their ability to apply consistent
training volume over time.
-
We often get too caught up in training and racing while
forgetting that we have created a vehicle to do cool stuff. Do
cool stuff and call it training. Schedule your –other” training
around these cool events. Ięm big on overnight cycling trips,
training camps with the boys/girls, etc. Have fun!!
-
Use these events or other breakthrough training sessions to
realign your perspective on what •long' is, reducing the mental
cost of subsequent sessions. An overdistance is ride is cool. Do a
few of them and 112 becomes just a number on the dial.
-
–The training value of misery is over-rated.” I know I can slam
my head into a wall. Likewise, just because I know I can ride 6
hours by myself doesnęt mean I need to practice it. –But youęll
be alone on race day.” No, you wonęt. Youęre on a catered
training ride with 2000 of your best friends and more motivation
in the air than you can stand. You WILL be mentally engaged
during the race. Train with other people and reduce the mental
cost of the session, leaving you energized and eager to come
back next week. In other words, have fun and donęt micromanage
unimportant details.
Alternatives
to Self-Selected Steady Time
Let me first say that the
longer the ride or run, the fewer intensity goals you should have
for the session. A 7 hour ride is hard enough without you trying
to make it harder by applying intensity goals to the session. But
for more manageable distances that do call for some intensity,
sometimes the self-selected route just isnęt enough. Here are
some alternatives to inserting flavors of Steady into your
training sessions:
-
Clock: at certain points on the clock ride at Steady, Upper
Steady, etc. The remainder of the time is Easy. This is
especially useful for group rides. For example, you start the
ride at 7am, with the first 1 hour as admin/social/easy time.
Then at the top and bottom of each hour everyone rides at their
Steady for 20ę, then regroups for an easy 10ę. Thatęs 40ę of
Steady time for each 60ę of ride time. Everyone gets to do
their thing and regroup for the trash talk for 20ę each hour.
-
Terrain: use hills or long flats as opportunities to force
Steady to Upper Steady time.
-
Other: more intense periods based on training partner consent or
other demands of the ride. For example, the long, flat section
where you and your partner always wind it out for a few, or the
obligation to ride a small group of roadies off your wheel.
Combine these tools with
self-selected Steady time to reduce the mental cost of your
training sessions. It's easier to decide to turn up the heat
when something or someone makes that decision for you (within
reason, of course).
Weekly Scheduling for Ironman Athletes
Self coached athletes often spend
entire weekends poring over spreadsheets, planning every detail of
their training for an entire season. They read books or websites
to determine the optimum training sessions to achieve their
goals. However, they often fail when scheduling these workouts
within an Ironman training week. Effective weekly scheduling
maximizes our use of available training resources and schedules
recovery time within each week, decreasing our risk of injury and
overtraining, and increasing our chances of training consistently
across the entire season.
These are the key ideas I use to schedule the
training of real world Ironman athletes:
Time required to train vs time available
to train
Your training schedule and goals must be framed within the
limitations of your real world constraints. Make a very honest
assessment of how much training time your life and lifestyle will
allow. Higher goals usually require more training time. At some
point you will be asked to compromise your lifestyle in some
manner, if simply training for an Ironman hasnęt already done it
for you! At that point your job as a coach is to reach into your
Scheduling Bag of Tricks and figure out ways to make the most
efficient use of available training time.
Three questions for each workout:
-
What is the
priority of this training session? You may even assign A,
B, and C priorities. A-priority sessions are usually long bike,
long run, and a quality cycling session. B and C-priority are
usually based on individual limiters. A non-swimmer may assign
A or B priority to a technique focused squad session, while a
weak runner/strong swimmer may assign B status to most of his
runs and Cęs to his swims. The sum of these priorities allows
you to set goals for the week and gives you guidance for
dropping or shifting workouts when Murphy comes knocking. For
example, given the priorities youęve assigned to each individual
session, the weekęs goal of –maintain run frequency of 4-5 runs”
may imply:
- Maintain the long run
- Ok to shorten other runs, if
needed, but do your best to get in at least X minutes for each
session.
- Ok to shorten a bike session,
eliminate a swim session, or even add a swim session as active
recovery.
- Is the scheduled combination
of volume and intensity appropriate for my goals? For
weekday sessions this most commonly this means taking a hard
look at scheduled intensity. Cycling session volume is usually
a function of session time available. Running session volume is
a function of your running base, ie a 60ę Wednesday run is too
long, but 45ę is just right. However, within each of these
sessions it is very easy to schedule the inappropriate
intensity, which leads me to my next point.
- What impact will this
session have on downstream training sessions? You must not
look at each workout in isolation, but rather within the context
of the entire training week. That killer bike interval session
on Tuesday may be a great tool for improving your fitness, but
how will it impact your Wednesday and Thursday sessions? The
net is that the Ironman athlete usually can not look to Olympic
or even Half Ironman training weeks as a model. As weęve
discussed before, the intensity of this training is often
incompatible with the volume of Ironman training. This is a
critical idea that many self-coached athletes miss, simply
cramming too much intensity and/or volume too closely together.
Crucible Fitness Suggested Training Week
In Crucible Fitness World, the typical IM week consists of two
to four swims, three to four bikes, four to six runs, five to six
stretching sessions of 15-20 minutes each, and one to two strength
training sessions, if appropriate and time permitting. Within
this week, our key training sessions are the long run, the long
bike, and a quality cycling session. We place these on the
calendar first, with 36-48+ hours between each, and
schedule other training sessions around them.
|
Event |
Mon |
Tues |
Wed |
Thur |
Fri |
Sat |
Sun |
|
Swim |
Drills |
|
Quality |
|
Long |
|
Flex |
|
Bike |
|
Quality |
|
|
|
Long |
Flex |
|
Run |
Strides |
AeT |
AeT or
Quality |
Long |
|
20-30ę
brick |
Flex |
|
Wghts |
Yes |
|
|
|
Yes |
|
|
|
Core |
Yes |
|
Yes |
|
Yes |
|
Yes |
Long run: 1.5-2.5 hours, Easy to AeT
with self-selected Steady. For the majority of the season we just
run, letting hills bump us into higher heart rate ranges but not
forcing it. As the season progresses weęll drop the volume and
increase the intensity of these runs. I recommend you run long in
the morning, out of the heat. In fact, I highly recommend you do
your most important session of the day in the morning, if
possible. Chances are your boss wonęt make you do anything before
7am, but he (and you) have all day to think up a reason to bag
your evening session. Get up early, get it done and forget about
it.
Long bike: 4-6+ hours, Easy to
Steady. Stronger athletes can self-select Upper Steady or even
Moderate-Hard. However, intensity goals decrease as the session
volume increases. With very few exceptions, I donęt prescribe
brick runs after rides of 5.5-6 hours. I feel the combined
recovery cost is often too great. Ięd rather have the athlete
ride for 5-6 hours, rest, recover, and have a quality second long
bike or run the next day.
Quality bike: This session is used to
accomplish our goals for the training period. In the early season
we may use this session to develop pedaling skills. We may then
progress to workouts targeting Force or lactate threshold power.
These are primarily interval-based and the volume of the session
is relatively unimportant.
AeT: Aerobic Threshold sessions. The
volume of these workouts is highly individual. Donęt focus on the
•rawę volume but rather on the volume at the appropriate
intensity. Tuesday run is usually a PM run, not a brick.
Quality swim and run: again, the
purpose of these sessions is to accomplish the goals of the
training period. When I discuss Ironman swimming I'll get
into more detail for individual sessions. But the run, more
often than not, is simply about running frequently and
consistently. We don't do much sexy run training, in other
words. More later.
Flex Day: By moving the long run to
Thursday we have created the opportunity for a second long
bike, a –semi-long” run or another swim session, depending on our
goals for the week. Our key sessions are separated by 48 hours,
ideal for recovery time, and we have changed a Thursday ride from
a –60-90ęalone in the dark before work” session into a –3-5 hour
ride with my friends in the sun” session. Later in the season
weęll use the Flex day to schedule Epic cycling weekends. You may
chose to move your Flex day from Sunday to Saturday.
Day off? Monday is an active
recovery day. Friday is also a relatively light day.
So is Wednesday for that matter. Ięve found that by scheduling
the training week as a whole and paying more attention to the
recovery time between sessions than to the training sessions
themselves, we often eliminate the need for a day off. We
increase frequency, particularly on the run. Having said
that, itęs always better to take a day off than to "need” a day
off. If you want to take a day off, go for it. Just do
your best to preserve the integrity of your key sessions, shifting
everything else around.
All of my
training articles are also available at
Endurance Nation. As
a member of Endurance Nation you'll gain open access to over 25
training plans, affordable group coaching solutions, 400+
articles, and join a vibrant community of smart and supportive
endurance athletes. Please visit
Endurance Nation to
learn more.
|